bimagazine an artistic project of the American Institute of Bisexuality AIB american institute of bisexuality
non fiction fiction poetry poetry visual arts music film theater
Inside BiMagazine  
Featured Article
by Jan Steckel MD, Oakland, CA
I Just Do This to Seduce Gay Men

If you were a straight man, I would run to Newbury Street to buy a red dress. I would choose the dress that made me look the softest and most fragile. It would be silk; not shantung, but a thin silk that runs off the body like water. It would be a dress that would speak vulnerability; it would communicate a need for you, no man but you. It would say, “I need shelter. Be the fixed point in my universe, my unchangeable rock, and I will be your light and music.” You, being a straight man, would not resist the feel of silk, for they never do. So when you yielded to your desire to touch me, to tear the dress from me, you would be the fire and I would be the air.

If I were a man, and as tall and strong a man as I am a woman, I would be taller and stronger than you. I would come behind you in your beautiful South End apartment and reach around you, my left arm across your chest, to grasp your right shoulder in my left hand. I would press my chest against your back and kiss the back of your neck while my rough chin grazed your skin. With my right hand I would stroke your hair, your neck, your collarbone, your side (drifting down each rib), your right hip, and the inside of your right thigh. When I finally touched your cock, you would already be hard and trying to turn to me, but I wouldn't let you turn. I would hold you even tighter against me, lick my hand and grasp you again with my wet palm. Only when you cried out for me would I turn you, gently force you onto the floor, and take you in my mouth. You would reach to touch my face, my hair, but I would grab your wrists and hold them while I went down on you. When you arched your back and came, I would shift my grip from your wrists to your hands, knotting my fingers in yours for a moment; then I would stand up, walk over to the couch, lie down in a pin-up pose and grin at you like a cat that just swallowed a canary.

Cruelty compounded, I said after a liter of sangria in Tapeo, that I should meet you now, for whom my heart leaps in recognition, as though I spoke to the other half of my own soul-- only I'm leaving town, and you're gay. Do I win the prize for choosing unattainable men? Come back to Berkeley, Susie the Gynecologist said to me, and I will take you to every girl bar in the East Bay-- you will see how soon you will forget him and Boston, too. Will the girls in the girl bars delight me with their wit and depth? Will they know more words than I do, and the meaning of words in history? Will they possess that peculiar combination of mischief and mildness that reached through my ribcage and seized the core of me before I had time to protect myself, as I certainly would have had I seen it coming? Will they make me feel that I have met my opposite in chirality, my imaginative stereo-isomer? We sat across a coffee-house table in Harvard Square one night, you and I, comparing patterns of sexual attraction, and you said, “We're not so different.” I reached my left hand to clasp your left hand (turning the gesture into a high-five so as not to be too intimate), and for a moment we seemed like two opposite knight's moves on a chess-board, each a reflection of the other around a point in the center of the table. Then why did I call myself a bisexual woman, and you call yourself a gay man? Because as I press my knee between a woman's legs in a Monterey gay bar and hold her against the wall that's shaking with each dance beat, and she makes that sound that takes me to some atavistic place where I want to throw her on the bar and ravage her with pleasure, some part of me still wonders: will I ever feel again the rainbow that opened up inside me with your brotherly kiss?

No, I told you, closing the Copley Plaza bar over excellent scotch, I didn't think people who wanted to have sex change operations just needed counseling instead. On the other hand, I felt they were still bound by stereotypes of femininity and masculinity. I kept Loren Cameron's book Body Alchemy, a collection of photographic portraits of female-to-male transsexuals, right next to the latest issue of Vogue. I liked the juxtaposition, because both represented people who had drastically modified their bodies in pursuit of a highly sexually dimorphic ideal of beauty, so that fashion models and transsexuals had more in common with each other than either did with me. Did I want to be a man? I told you I didn't. I had intermittently until I was twenty, when sex got really great. When I was twenty-three, I heard a lecture in which a man in his late forties exhorted us to try to remember that adolescents were so callow that the most transcendent thing most of them had ever experienced was an orgasm. I looked around surreptitiously to see if the faces of any of my colleagues betrayed what I was thinking: that I had never experienced anything more transcendent than an orgasm, either. Guess what, I told you: at thirty-four, I still hadn't. So, I boasted, no amount of male privilege was ever going to induce me to give up the capacity to enjoy a dozen orgasms in a single morning. Two months later, I was wishing I could borrow my six-foot-four brother's body with which to seduce you. I would love you for two months, or three, and then, poof! I would turn into me again, and say-- if you loved me in that body, why can't you love me in this?

“Bisexuals don't exist,” you said, your arm around me, walking by the Fens. “Everybody has a preference. No one's really fifty-fifty.” Well, if sexual orientation were a bipolar linear continuum, your thesis would be trivially provable. Try this experiment. Buy yourself one of those magnetic poetry kits, and start sticking the words up on your freezer door. Make columns for the different parts of speech. Here's a verb: “ask.”

 

Always a verb, can't even imagine being a noun. Here's a noun: “peach.” Under the right unusual circumstances it might explore its adjective side, as in “peach pie,” but its principal orientation is as a noun. But what about “moan?” When you're moaning it's a verb, but when you let out a moan, it's a noun. Okay, you say, so we'll line up our words in part-of-speech columns, but in between the main columns we can have little Kinsey scales for these half-noun, half-verb kind of words. Still, if you counted up the occurrences in English literature of “moan,” you would find that it had a predominant orientation. It would more often be one or the other, a verb or a noun, right? “Moan” has a preference. I don't mean to rain on your parade, but if you ever visit a rain forest, you will appreciate that not only did a little rain never hurt anyone, but “rain” can be a verb, an adjective, or a noun. So parallel columns aren't going to cut it, but we can make word clusters at the vertices of a triangle, with nouns, verbs and adjectives comprising the three corners. Some words go along the edges, and words that can act as all three parts of speech go somewhere in the middle of the triangle. The distance of words from the corners is determined by the frequency with which they are used in each context. All of language is a plane, right? Well, now, take the word “fast.” You fast on Yom Kippur, then you break your fast in the company of a fast woman, and drive home fast together to her place. That is, “fast” can be a verb, a noun, an adjective, or an adverb. If you make your triangle a square, you're not defining unique points anymore. Maybe you need to go beyond the Cartesian plane for this. Maybe you need a third dimension, and some of your words are going to end up inside the freezer. Now take all the words in all the languages on earth, and try to represent them on the same graph. You're going to need a lot more than three dimensions. You're going to be in hyperspace in no time.

If language is impossible to represent linearly or to categorize neatly, how much more complex must be our sexuality, which may be the only domain of the brain more creative and more quintessentially human than language? For after all, linguistic expression is limited by the range of words and inflections, but sexuality is limited only by the imagination that created the words in the first place. So even if phonemes aren't discrete, and linguistic combinations might not be finite, sexuality has got to be a whole different order of infinity from language. Sexuality isn't a continuum along a line. It's more than a plane, and more than a space. It's so complex you can never categorize it, and from my perspective, the categories are just one more role play in which people indulge so they can get off in shorthand. This makes the term “bisexual” another misnomer, incorporating as it does the assumption of dichotomy.

In order to define yourself as gay, why do you feel it necessary to deny the existence of what are commonly referred to as “bisexuals”? Why assume God made everyone else in your image? How can you climb into another's skin, how claim to know the range of the human heart from Australopithecus to Homo Superior? I stand before you to clamor: I exist! As I am, from earliest memory, pluripotential. Never again will I shut down whole wings of the house of my mind, never again pretend to be normal-- not straight, not gay, not masculine, not feminine, but all at once and none of these: I am the bisexual artist, and I refuse to differentiate. I am the stem cell of the human line, the representative of mankind at its most complete. Men like me composed the greatest ballads, epics and dramas, because we could become any character; we understood as well what it meant to be a woman as a man, a heterosexual as a homosexual, the lover as the beloved. I see traces of others like me throughout history, shot like gold thread all through the red silk of literature, glittering like mica in the gravel running through the glass of time. I may be a totem that has been with us since before writing, or a step in the evolution of the species, but I am something the world must not be allowed to do away with. I do exist, and I have a right to exist.

Do you really want to do to me what the world tries every day to do to you? Or do you want all the imagery at my command to re-create a world in which you can marry the man you love and become the superb father you deserve to be? Believe me, you'll miss my arm in battle if you deny me now and continue in this Balkanized fashion. When I held in my hands the head of a slender fifteen-year-old boy who had put a gun in his mouth, and I saw his teeth hanging out by the wires of his braces, I didn't wonder whether he was really gay or bisexual, and I wouldn't have cried more if he'd been a girl. The fight for existence is too important to be conducted as a tribal war. It would be so easy to polarize: to say to you, my dear, I don't believe you exist, either. I believe that, like almost all of humanity, you have chosen a comfortable pigeonhole, and that you deny my reality so that I won't disturb your world view and rattle that pigeonhole. Too easy! In my mind I freely grant you the identity you claim, that of a homosexual man. In return for the power of my voice beside you, be as generous in your imagination with me, and try to see me as I see myself. If you don't stop telling the world that bisexuals don't exist, I may be forced to drag you through my entire erotic history just to keep you from condemning me to the status of the unicorn, the Yeti, and the G-spot.

-

First appeared in Anything That Moves, No. 17, Summer 1998.

 

Jan Steckel, MD is an Oakland, California writer, a former pediatrician and a bisexual activist whose creative nonfiction has appeared in Anything That Moves, Yale Medicine, Hospital Physician, Bi Women, KP Pride Voices, Awakened Woman, Diverticulum, Gringo Grita, and the anthology Becoming Doctors.

She also writes fiction, poetry and book reviews. You can find more of her work at jansteckel.com

 
 
 
Copyright © 2008 bimagazine.org  All Rights Reserved