| If
you were a straight man, I would run to
Newbury Street to buy a red dress. I would
choose the dress that made me look the softest
and most fragile. It would be silk; not
shantung, but a thin silk that runs off
the body like water. It would be a dress
that would speak vulnerability; it would
communicate a need for you, no man but you.
It would say, “I need shelter. Be
the fixed point in my universe, my unchangeable
rock, and I will be your light and music.”
You, being a straight man, would not resist
the feel of silk, for they never do. So
when you yielded to your desire to touch
me, to tear the dress from me, you would
be the fire and I would be the air.
If I were a man, and
as tall and strong a man as I am a woman,
I would be taller and stronger than you.
I would come behind you in your beautiful
South End apartment and reach around you,
my left arm across your chest, to grasp
your right shoulder in my left hand. I would
press my chest against your back and kiss
the back of your neck while my rough chin
grazed your skin. With my right hand I would
stroke your hair, your neck, your collarbone,
your side (drifting down each rib), your
right hip, and the inside of your right
thigh. When I finally touched your cock,
you would already be hard and trying to
turn to me, but I wouldn't let you turn.
I would hold you even tighter against me,
lick my hand and grasp you again with my
wet palm. Only when you cried out for me
would I turn you, gently force you onto
the floor, and take you in my mouth. You
would reach to touch my face, my hair, but
I would grab your wrists and hold them while
I went down on you. When you arched your
back and came, I would shift my grip from
your wrists to your hands, knotting my fingers
in yours for a moment; then I would stand
up, walk over to the couch, lie down in
a pin-up pose and grin at you like a cat
that just swallowed a canary.
Cruelty compounded,
I said after a liter of sangria in Tapeo,
that I should meet you now, for whom my
heart leaps in recognition, as though I
spoke to the other half of my own soul--
only I'm leaving town, and you're gay. Do
I win the prize for choosing unattainable
men? Come back to Berkeley, Susie the Gynecologist
said to me, and I will take you to every
girl bar in the East Bay-- you will see
how soon you will forget him and Boston,
too. Will the girls in the girl bars delight
me with their wit and depth? Will they know
more words than I do, and the meaning of
words in history? Will they possess that
peculiar combination of mischief and mildness
that reached through my ribcage and seized
the core of me before I had time to protect
myself, as I certainly would have had I
seen it coming? Will they make me feel that
I have met my opposite in chirality, my
imaginative stereo-isomer? We sat across
a coffee-house table in Harvard Square one
night, you and I, comparing patterns of
sexual attraction, and you said, “We're
not so different.” I reached my left
hand to clasp your left hand (turning the
gesture into a high-five so as not to be
too intimate), and for a moment we seemed
like two opposite knight's moves on a chess-board,
each a reflection of the other around a
point in the center of the table. Then why
did I call myself a bisexual woman, and
you call yourself a gay man? Because as
I press my knee between a woman's legs in
a Monterey gay bar and hold her against
the wall that's shaking with each dance
beat, and she makes that sound that takes
me to some atavistic place where I want
to throw her on the bar and ravage her with
pleasure, some part of me still wonders:
will I ever feel again the rainbow that
opened up inside me with your brotherly
kiss?
No, I told you, closing
the Copley Plaza bar over excellent scotch,
I didn't think people who wanted to have
sex change operations just needed counseling
instead. On the other hand, I felt they
were still bound by stereotypes of femininity
and masculinity. I kept Loren Cameron's
book Body Alchemy, a collection of photographic
portraits of female-to-male transsexuals,
right next to the latest issue of Vogue.
I liked the juxtaposition, because both
represented people who had drastically modified
their bodies in pursuit of a highly sexually
dimorphic ideal of beauty, so that fashion
models and transsexuals had more in common
with each other than either did with me.
Did I want to be a man? I told you I didn't.
I had intermittently until I was twenty,
when sex got really great. When I was twenty-three,
I heard a lecture in which a man in his
late forties exhorted us to try to remember
that adolescents were so callow that the
most transcendent thing most of them had
ever experienced was an orgasm. I looked
around surreptitiously to see if the faces
of any of my colleagues betrayed what I
was thinking: that I had never experienced
anything more transcendent than an orgasm,
either. Guess what, I told you: at thirty-four,
I still hadn't. So, I boasted, no amount
of male privilege was ever going to induce
me to give up the capacity to enjoy a dozen
orgasms in a single morning. Two months
later, I was wishing I could borrow my six-foot-four
brother's body with which to seduce you.
I would love you for two months, or three,
and then, poof! I would turn into me again,
and say-- if you loved me in that body,
why can't you love me in this?
“Bisexuals don't
exist,” you said, your arm around
me, walking by the Fens. “Everybody
has a preference. No one's really fifty-fifty.”
Well, if sexual orientation were a bipolar
linear continuum, your thesis would be trivially
provable. Try this experiment. Buy yourself
one of those magnetic poetry kits, and start
sticking the words up on your freezer door.
Make columns for the different parts of
speech. Here's a verb: “ask.”
|
 |
Always a verb, can't even imagine being
a noun. Here's a noun: “peach.”
Under the right unusual circumstances it
might explore its adjective side, as in
“peach pie,” but its principal
orientation is as a noun. But what about
“moan?” When you're moaning
it's a verb, but when you let out a moan,
it's a noun. Okay, you say, so we'll line
up our words in part-of-speech columns,
but in between the main columns we can have
little Kinsey scales for these half-noun,
half-verb kind of words. Still, if you counted
up the occurrences in English literature
of “moan,” you would find that
it had a predominant orientation. It would
more often be one or the other, a verb or
a noun, right? “Moan” has a
preference. I don't mean to rain on your
parade, but if you ever visit a rain forest,
you will appreciate that not only did a
little rain never hurt anyone, but “rain”
can be a verb, an adjective, or a noun.
So parallel columns aren't going to cut
it, but we can make word clusters at the
vertices of a triangle, with nouns, verbs
and adjectives comprising the three corners.
Some words go along the edges, and words
that can act as all three parts of speech
go somewhere in the middle of the triangle.
The distance of words from the corners is
determined by the frequency with which they
are used in each context. All of language
is a plane, right? Well, now, take the word
“fast.” You fast on Yom Kippur,
then you break your fast in the company
of a fast woman, and drive home fast together
to her place. That is, “fast”
can be a verb, a noun, an adjective, or
an adverb. If you make your triangle a square,
you're not defining unique points anymore.
Maybe you need to go beyond the Cartesian
plane for this. Maybe you need a third dimension,
and some of your words are going to end
up inside the freezer. Now take all the
words in all the languages on earth, and
try to represent them on the same graph.
You're going to need a lot more than three
dimensions. You're going to be in hyperspace
in no time.
If language is impossible
to represent linearly or to categorize neatly,
how much more complex must be our sexuality,
which may be the only domain of the brain
more creative and more quintessentially
human than language? For after all, linguistic
expression is limited by the range of words
and inflections, but sexuality is limited
only by the imagination that created the
words in the first place. So even if phonemes
aren't discrete, and linguistic combinations
might not be finite, sexuality has got to
be a whole different order of infinity from
language. Sexuality isn't a continuum along
a line. It's more than a plane, and more
than a space. It's so complex you can never
categorize it, and from my perspective,
the categories are just one more role play
in which people indulge so they can get
off in shorthand. This makes the term “bisexual”
another misnomer, incorporating as it does
the assumption of dichotomy.
In order to define yourself
as gay, why do you feel it necessary to
deny the existence of what are commonly
referred to as “bisexuals”?
Why assume God made everyone else in your
image? How can you climb into another's
skin, how claim to know the range of the
human heart from Australopithecus to Homo
Superior? I stand before you to clamor:
I exist! As I am, from earliest memory,
pluripotential. Never again will I shut
down whole wings of the house of my mind,
never again pretend to be normal-- not straight,
not gay, not masculine, not feminine, but
all at once and none of these: I am the
bisexual artist, and I refuse to differentiate.
I am the stem cell of the human line, the
representative of mankind at its most complete.
Men like me composed the greatest ballads,
epics and dramas, because we could become
any character; we understood as well what
it meant to be a woman as a man, a heterosexual
as a homosexual, the lover as the beloved.
I see traces of others like me throughout
history, shot like gold thread all through
the red silk of literature, glittering like
mica in the gravel running through the glass
of time. I may be a totem that has been
with us since before writing, or a step
in the evolution of the species, but I am
something the world must not be allowed
to do away with. I do exist, and I have
a right to exist.
Do you really want to
do to me what the world tries every day
to do to you? Or do you want all the imagery
at my command to re-create a world in which
you can marry the man you love and become
the superb father you deserve to be? Believe
me, you'll miss my arm in battle if you
deny me now and continue in this Balkanized
fashion. When I held in my hands the head
of a slender fifteen-year-old boy who had
put a gun in his mouth, and I saw his teeth
hanging out by the wires of his braces,
I didn't wonder whether he was really gay
or bisexual, and I wouldn't have cried more
if he'd been a girl. The fight for existence
is too important to be conducted as a tribal
war. It would be so easy to polarize: to
say to you, my dear, I don't believe you
exist, either. I believe that, like almost
all of humanity, you have chosen a comfortable
pigeonhole, and that you deny my reality
so that I won't disturb your world view
and rattle that pigeonhole. Too easy! In
my mind I freely grant you the identity
you claim, that of a homosexual man. In
return for the power of my voice beside
you, be as generous in your imagination
with me, and try to see me as I see myself.
If you don't stop telling the world that
bisexuals don't exist, I may be forced to
drag you through my entire erotic history
just to keep you from condemning me to the
status of the unicorn, the Yeti, and the
G-spot.
-
First appeared in Anything
That Moves, No. 17, Summer 1998.
|