| First
pornography confession: my first "pornography
erection" was at a friend's birthday
party. I was in fourth grade. He lived in
a spacious house, and the kids were allowed
to roam (he had brave parents!). I found
his bedroom, a bedroom that had its own
TV and a Playboy and Penthouse
collection. I turned the TV on, jumped on
the bed, and leafed through one magazine.
One particular pictorial caught my attention,
so much that if I had any sense I would
have jacked off. A woman was standing in
a washtub and being bathed by a man. She
had long legs and brown skin, but what intrigued
me was the couple. How did he get into the
scene? Does he like bathing her? Does she
like being bathed by him? The union of the
two, completely different from the centerfold,
held my interest so much that I stayed in
my friend's bedroom for the whole party.
Second pornography confession:
the first porn magazine I owned was stolen
from a store. All the big kids were stealing
from this store, so I figured I would give
it a try. I do not even remember the name
of the magazine (Cheri?), but there was
a pictorial that made me spend many hours
in my bedroom. She was a librarian. He was
a student. No need to continue because you
know the storyline, and if you don't, use
your imagination. Once again, this particular
pictorial moved me beyond anything else
in the magazine, except for the erotic fiction.
There was something about them, together,
that I wanted to be a part of. I had to
throw the magazine away because I was scared
my parents would find it.
Last pornography confession:
the first pornography video I bought was
a bisexual compilation. I bought it because
of the cover. There were three folk: a woman
and two men. One of the men was in the middle,
while the other two leaned on each of his
arms. All three smiled into the camera,
although the middle guy had a sexy smirk
on his face. Before I ever watched the tape,
I jerked off to the box cover.
What do these confessions
add up to? Aside from an expansive pornographic
history, they are the building blocks to
(dare I use the word?) a sexuality that
can be described as bisexual. There I said
it. No hissing please! I get a bit anxious
describing myself as bisexual because of
all the baggage associated with the word.
Some baggage that is unfair, and other baggage
that is deserved because we bisexuals are
bags of wind. The whole "I love people,
not genitals" line is witty rhetoric,
but has a smug smell to it. As if gender
love is a big sin. Also bisexuals are bothersome.
We use ugly words like "bi-phobia",
complain constantly about having no safe
places, cry over the disdain from gays and
lesbians, cry over the disgust from straight
folk, and assume we are the vanguard of
some glorious revolution that will bring
KY to every household (the sound you now
hear is my bisexual card being ripped at
the center). Maybe all of the above will
happen when people define themselves only
by sexuality, as if sexuality is some progressive
force that is going to change the world.
If being fucked by a woman with a strap-on,
as my face is buried in some guy's (or woman's)
hairy bush, would end world hunger I would
do it in a minute -- I would even do it
if it would not end world hunger -- but
that personal act does not change the material
world, a world that is simultaneously independent
and authoritative. Sexuality, while fun,
is not revolutionary and will not bring
the walls of oppression down. The attempt
to make bisexuality, or any sexuality for
that matter, into the Holy Grail, or the
cure for the common cold, is a fool's game.
If sexuality, or bisexuality,
is so benign, then why write about it? Good
question, and if I am bitter, or drunk,
I say I write about it because my sex life
is wretched. If I am neither bitter nor
drunk, then I paraphrase a line from Bernard
Malamud's The Tenants: I write
about sexuality because I know so little
about it. Claiming an identity as a sexual
being is effortless, but what is not so
effortless is looking at the history that
created that claim. Am I bisexual because
I watched pornography, or did my bisexual
nature seek out pornography?
|
 |
A
complicated question. Maybe a question that
does not have an explanation; however, as
a starting point let's turn to British cultural
critic Jonathan Dollimore's ideas as quoted
in Marjorie Garber's Visa Versa:
I find if I look
at a video of a man and a woman having sex,
I very much identify with both positions.
I also find that the identification with
the woman doesn't correspond precisely with
my gay experience where, for example, I
might want to be fucked by that man as another
man...I want to be fucked by that man as
a woman -- my experience is very strongly
with the woman -- my desire is going very
strongly through the woman. To put it quite
simply, there are times when I want the
vagina. I'm not just wanting to position
myself in the position of the woman as a
man.
I am just jerking off
when I look at a video, but there is something
about Dollimore's words that illuminates.
I very much identify with both positions.
Maybe the doublings, or to be literary for
a moment, double consciousness, of pornography
appeals to my bisexuality. Pornography allows
the sexual pleasure of men and women to
be glimpsed, and that is what attracts me.
Unlike Dollimore I have no desire for a
vagina, but I do want to see the clitoris
and penis be pleasured, and my early forays
into porn satisfied that need. Of course
this theory is tenuous because it would
mean I am into straight porn, which I'm
not. Granted, I stole Cheri magazine when
I was younger, but so much straight porn
seems focused on the "money shot"
of the man. That's fine, which explains
the attraction to gay porn, but if both
men and women are going to be involved,
the bisexual freak in me wants to see both
partners having fun. Both partners as the
center of attention.
Of course all of this
speculation can be quickly explained by
one word: perversity. Maybe I am just a
pervert. Plain and simple. To be honest,
that seems more likely. Just so you do not
think my sex life is all about pornography
(it is, but allow me to live in my illusions),
here is a story that involves real people.
In middle school, there was a girl named
Susie I was madly in lust with. I lusted
after Susie because she had stunning breasts.
They were large, and stalked my dreams.
Unfortunately, Susie
liked me only as a "friend", and
decided to date Mark, a geeky guy who wore
jeans jackets. Mark knew of my lusty thoughts
concerning Susie, and would tell me about
their escapades during a math class. Pretty
progressive for a middle school kid if you
think about it. Mark, either being sadistic
or a perv, would allow to me read the letters
he and Susie wrote to each other. These
letters intensified my lust for Susie, but
also turned Mark into an object of lust.
Soon I was dreaming of both Mark and Susie,
and would have gladly done anything for
them both if only asked.
Unfortunately, or fortunately
depending on your perspective, there are
many Marks and Susies in my past, but the
number of Marks and Susies does not add
much to my sex life. While I may dream of
stunning breasts and jeans jackets, I end
up spending Friday evenings watching "Homicide"
(alas no longer on the air except in reruns)
and listening to Sonny Rollins. I am a pervert
without the life of a pervert. If my early
trips to pornography highlighted a bisexual
nature, they also highlighted an unconscious
acknowledgment that there would be a fissure
between my desires and reality, an acceptance
that life is ultimately about solitude no
matter how much booty you get. If solitude
is our lot, part of our "human condition"
(for proof read Marquez's One Hundred
Years of Solitude), then bisexuality
does not obliterate that. Double desire
does not imply removal of loneliness. Isn't
that always the case? Or is this just justification
for a pathetic sex life? Or is this the
life of a bisexual?
|